
This year I managed to lose nearly 10 lbs and it is with a heavy heart (literally) that I say in the last three months I have put 5 back on. Stress is my enemy sadly, and work combined with work travel combined with a painful lower back have made me more inclined to stay inclined -- with a snack -- rather than decline said temptations.
So I was fascinated by this story in one of my favourite blogs, Freakonomics. I posted something awhile ago about the new calorie disclosure law in NYC, and the Freakonomics folks have had a couple of really interesting stories on the realities of its effectiveness, like this one, and more recently this one about creative ways of encouraging people to make healthy choices. (I love the calorie counting stairs.)
They ask the question, "But since the people most influenced by calorie counts may be the least likely to go looking for cheese fries, what kind of effect does this kind of sign have?", which is a good question.
I'd answer that it's not the truly obese, nor the Olympians, who are the "target" (as the ad jargon goes). It's the folks like me, playing the percentages of "right vs wrong" choices and hoping the numbers add up to something reasonable on the scale in the morning. So, if I'm tempted to order fries, well, seeing that the large is 1000 calories makes it an easy pass. I can't deny that it doesn't add up.
On the other hand, if I'm the type of person who seriously considers "chili cheese fries", then let's face it, I really just don't want to know. And I won't.
And this, people, is what they mean by the concept of "plausible denial."
